REWILDING THE WHITE SALMON RIVER
Attached is an excellent review of research and findings to date of the state of wild fish since the dam removal. Please take the time to read the September 2020 issue of The Osprey
Salmon and Steelhead Restoration
While many mid-Columbia residents may believe that salmon habitat restoration on the White Salmon River was achieved by the removal of Condit Dam, actually that momentous act signified just the beginning of restoration. Habitat, underwater for decades, has needed native tree and shrub planting, post-dam salmon studies, and a determination of the fate of over 500 acres of PacifiCorps lands adjacent to the former Condit Dam.
According to the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW), and US Geological Survey in their April 2016 report in Fisheries, both salmon and steelhead species seem to be taking advantage of new spawning and rearing habitat options made available via the removal of Condit Dam. The former dam restricted anadromous fish to less suitable spawning and rearing habitat downstream of the dam and blocked up to 50 km of potential habitat for steelhead, 7 km of habitat for fall Chinook Salmon, 15 km of habitat for spring Chinook Salmon, and 27 km of habitat for Coho Salmon.
WDFW reports that spring Chinook are utilizing the area above Condit Dam’s former location with most of the spawning occurring below Husum Falls. The falls, ranging from 10-12 feet in height, are about 4.5 miles from BZ Falls, which would stop all but the most athletic fish.
The spawning in long-vacant areas upstream of the former dam and its reservoir, Northwestern Lake, indicates the first success of the salmon restoration for the White Salmon basin: the natural re-colonization of species that flourished in the river prior to dam construction.
A few spring Chinook were suspected in recent history to have spawned annually in the lower 3.3 miles of the river as well as the White Salmon tributaries of Rattlesnake Creek (entering the White Salmon at rkm 11.9), Spring Creek (rkm 10.6), Buck Creek (rkm 8.0), and Mill Creek (rkm 6.4). However, most of the new recruits are believed to be strays from nearby rivers and hatcheries. Nearby donors could be the Hood River across the Columbia in Oregon and Washington’s Klickitat River. Compared to other salmon streams, the mainstem White Salmon River water is cold throughout the year, and river flow is maintained by springs and seeps coming from high-altitude snowmelt throughout the year.
The White Salmon Working Group, which is a consortium of Yakama Nation, federal, state, and PacifiCorp biologists, has estimated the White Salmon River has enough spawning grounds to accommodate more than 600 steelhead spawners and 1,200 fall Chinook. Bull trout, Coho, lamprey and spring Chinook could also benefit from a reconnected river.
More than $37 million has been invested in restoring fish passage to the White Salmon River, and efforts are underway to learn about the results of that investment. The 2016 monitoring of juvenile salmon is funded by a grant from the Washington State Salmon Recovery Funding Board. In addition to the rotary screw trap, the grant will support limited sampling of juvenile salmon and steelhead in the mainstem White Salmon River and selected tributaries by scientists using backpack electrofishing.
Fundraising for Fish Research
Condit Dam removal in 2011 was historic, opening a cold-water river just one major dam from the ocean. Pre-dam stocks of Steelhead (rainbow trout if they don’t go to the ocean) were trapped behind the dam. Are they now returning to anadromy? Are other stocks of Steelhead, Chinook salmon, and Coho salmon establishing and increasing natural spawning populations in the White Salmon River?
The answers appear to be “yes,” but that’s about all we know because there is insufficient money for research and monitoring.
Dr. Pat Connolly, now retired from USGS and a member of the FWSR Board of Directors, was heavily involved in pre-dam removal research. He and his collaborators wrote a plan for post-removal research, and this research has still not been funded! Dr. Connolly estimates that about 10% of the needed research is being done. Ten percent. Think about that.
There is a clock ticking on research on wild salmon and steelhead. The countdown is to the start-up of commercial tribal fishing, which may bring the introduction of hatchery stocks. Can the wild fish produce sufficient harvest to forestall a move to hatchery fish which compete with wild stock? We need answers, and answers require multi-year research.
Existing research funds are limited and are committed to worthy projects elsewhere. The normal sources for funding are tapped out.
Seven spawning seasons have now passed since dam removal. Climate change is upon us. The situation is urgent.
There is a research plan. There are researchers available. There are funding mechanisms through the Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group. We can gear up quickly. All we need is money.
Clark Skamania Flyfishers, bless them, are funding one juvenile salmon and steelhead annual count in the mainstem of the river, below Husum. The Yakama Nation are doing some monitoring of steelhead spawning in Rattlesnake Creek. Much more is needed.
How much money is needed? Optimal funding would be $300,000 for the first year of research, including equipment purchase, and about $175,000 per year for five additional years. Any amount of money raised will be used for fish research. Even small amounts can be useful as matching funds for other grants, or in other ways.
Maybe it’s silly for a volunteer organization with an annual budget under $10,000 to try to raise this money. However, it is our mission, and so we must put our hearts into this.
Each person’s efforts matter significantly, immensely, tremendously to the restoration and protection of the White Salmon River. Join us in this effort. Together we can make history.
We invite you to stay up to date with alerts and news.